The IP High Court ruled registered mark “KIRIN” is used independently regardless of promotional campaign named as “KIRIN Plus-i”
On November 7, 2016, the IP High Co…
YouTube social icon serves to function as a source indicator of hosting service via internet due to inherent distinctiveness.
On September 23, the Appeal Board a…
“ROYAL PRESTIGE NEO” is decided similar to “ROYAL PRESTIGE” (JPO Appeal No. 2015-5083)
The Appeal Board of the JPO decided…
“AQUA COLLAGEN GEL” is not a descriptive term, but a source indicator by means of acquired distinctiveness.
On October 27, 2016, the IP High Co…
Can shape of goods be protected under the Unfair Competition Prevention Law?
Imitation of training chopsticks Pl…
The IP High Court refused a word mark “HOKOTABAUM” due to lack of inherent distinctiveness
In a dispute regarding distinctiven…
“ANNIVERSARY DIAMOND” versus “ANNIVERSARY”
The JPO Appeal Board ruled that a s…
Registrability of two alphabetical letter trademarks in Japan
According to Article 3(1)(v) of the…
Similarity of Goods and/or Services
Article 4(1)(xi) of the Japanese Tr…
Name of a deceased historical person as trademark
Trademark containing the name, famo…