NIKE unsuccessful in registering JUST DO IT on cosmetics

In a recent decision, the Appeal Board of Japan Patent Office (JPO) dismissed an appeal filed by NIKE Innovate C.V., who attempted to register a word mark “JUST DO IT” in standard character on cosmetics and other goods classified in class 3 by means of “defensive mark” under Article 64 of the Japan Trademark Law.
[Appeal case No. 2015-23031, Gazette issued date: February 23, 2018]

 

DEFENSIVE MARK

According to Article 64, famous brand owner is entitled to register its brand as “defensive mark” with respect to dissimilar goods/services that are not designated under the basic registration, where the owner shall demonstrate that the mark has acquired remarkable prestige in relation to the goods/services on which the mark has been substantially used, and thus there will be likely to occur confusion with the owner if an identical or similar mark is used on dissimilar or remotely associated goods/services with basic registration.

 

JUST DO IT

NIKE Innovate C.V. owns trademark registration no. 4206837 for the word mark “JUST DO IT” on apparels, shoes and sportswear and other goods in class 25 since 1998.

NIKE sought to register the mark as defensive mark on cosmetics (class 3) on October 22, 2014 (Trademark application no. 2014-88774). Examiner refused the application by stating that it is unclear whether the mark has been used in connection with applicant’s goods of class 25. If so, the mark can be recognized merely as a commercial slogan to represent sports event. Consequently, examiner considers the mark has not become well-known mark as a source indicator of applicant.

To contest the refusal, NIKE filed an appeal on December 15, 2015.

 

BOARD DECISION

The Appeal Board likewise questioned whether “JUST DO IT” has been used as a source indicator of apparel, shoes, or sportswear.

Board admitted a certain degree of popularity and reputation on the term “JUST DO IT” as a corporate message from NIKE, however, upheld the refusal by stating that the produced advertisement and evidences regarding “JUST DO IT” are insufficient and vague to connect the term with goods designated under basic registration.


Apparently, the Board underestimated “JUST DO IT” on the grounds that NIKE failed to advertise the term in a manner closely connected with specific goods.

Masaki MIKAMI, Attorney at IP Law – Founder of MARKS IP LAW FIRM

 

Premium Friday – Minister is eligible to own trademark registration

In an effort to curb excessive work hours and to boost weak consumer spending, the Japan government and business lobby groups launched the Premium Friday campaign on Feb. 24, 2017.
The government-backed “Premium Friday” campaign calls on workers to leave the office at around 3 p.m. on the last Friday of each month so that they can go out and have fun.
However, only a small number of companies have managed to establish the practice of departing early in fact, while operators of department stores and amusement facilities are running out of ideas to attract visitors on the designated Fridays.


By the way, who on earth takes it for granted that “Premium Friday” is a registered mark?

The Japan Patent Office on-line database revealed the following “Premium Friday” marks used on the campaign have been registered without a doubt.

TM Registration no. 5942825

TM Registration no. 5954624


You would feel like questioning “Who is a registrant?”, wouldn’t you?
When I found the name of the registrant, I was shocked!
Registrant of “Premium Friday” marks is Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, not an individual person assuming the position of Minister.
I didn’t know that Minister is eligible to own trademark registration in the name of ministerial capacity. Does such thing happen only in Japan?

Masaki MIKAMI, Attorney at IP Law – Founder of MARKS IP LAW FIRM

Can Slogans be Trademarks?

Properly marketed slogans, product phrases and other types of taglines serve to build a brand identity in the minds of consumers. Such slogans become instantly synonymous with the brand, reflecting the company’s products and values in one short statement, and thus worthy of trademark registration.

Brand owners should seek to protect and enforce their rights using trademark law.

 

The question is can slogans be registered as a trademark?

In order to be registered as a trademark, slogans or taglines will have to fulfil the usual criteria for trademark registration, in that it must:

  • Be ‘distinctive’: if the trademark is too descriptive of the goods or services or any characteristics of them, the JPO will likely object to your trademark.

  • Be available for registration in your chosen class, i.e. the same or a similar slogan must not have been already registered in the same or similar group of your chosen goods/services;

 

Distinctiveness of Slogans

Trademark Guideline pertinent to Article 3(1)(vi) of the Trademark Law stipulates a standard for slogans.

For a trademark composed of merely terms indicating advertisement of chosen goods/services or corporate philosophy or management policy;

(1)   Where an applied trademark is recognized to indicate advertisement of chosen goods/services or corporate philosophy or management policy in a commonly-used method, such mark is not registrable based on Article 3(1)(vi). In the meantime, where an applied trademark can be recognized not only as advertisement of chosen goods/services or corporate philosophy or management policy but also as a coined word, such mark is deemed distinctive.

(2)   In determining whether the applied trademark is recognized just as advertisement of chosen goods/services, it is judged by taking a concept generated from the entire mark, connection with the chosen goods/services, actual commercial transaction, configuration of the mark, etc. into consideration comprehensively.

(a)     Circumstances in which a trademark is recognized to indicate just advertisement of chosen goods/services

(Factors)

  • The mark indicates explanations of the goods/services;
  • The mark indicates characteristics and superiority of the goods/services;
  • The mark briefly indicates quality and characteristics of the goods/services;
  • The mark consists of words commonly used for advertisement of goods/services (However, it is not required that example suggests actual use of the chosen goods/services for advertisement).

(b)     Circumstances in which a trademark recognizes something other than advertisement of goods/services

 (Factors)

  • The mark is not recognized to have a direct or specific meaning in relation to the chosen goods/services.
  • Whereas an applicant uses the applied trademark for a certain period of time as a mark which distinguishes its goods/services from those of others, a third party does not use the words identical with or similar to the applied trademark as advertisement.

(3)   In determining whether the applied trademark is recognized just as corporate philosophy or management policy, it is judged by comprehensively taking a concept generated from the entire goods/services, connection with the chosen goods/services, actual commercial transaction, configuration of the mark, etc. into consideration

(a)     Circumstances in which the trademark is recognized just as corporate philosophy or management policy

(Factors)

  • The mark describes characteristics and superiority of a company;
  • The mark is described with words commonly used to indicate corporate philosophy or management policy.

(b)     Circumstances in which the trademark is recognized something other than corporate philosophy or management policy

(Factors)

  • Whereas an applicant uses the applied mark for a certain period of  time as a mark which distinguishes its goods/services from those of others, a third party does not use the words identical with or similar to the applied mark as corporate philosophy or management policy.

It is this distinctive requirement that can often pose the greatest hurdle for brand owners seeking to register their slogans as trademarks.

 

Precedent cases

JPO has rejected following slogans due to lack of distinctiveness based on above criteria.

“KEEP THE LIFE LINE”
“ECO-STYLE”
“TOTAL CAR LIFE”
“TECHNOLOGY FOR A HEALTHY WORLD”

 

1187hirai%e4%bf%ae%e6%ad%a3003_2  MASAKI MIKAMI – Attorney at IP Law